Peter Oborne Wants Those Guilty Men Who Wanted The UK To Join The Euro To Speak Up!

Nigel Farage at the UKIP Conference 2011

 

The Cat Is Out Of The Bag About 'United States Of Europe' By Ex German Leader

Well we knew it all along didn't we, they may have been trying to hide it from the normal men and women in the street, but the aim of what the EU wants to be has actually been stated by former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder.  He considers that the UK is the biggest problem in Europe, because we want to have a voice when it comes to British matters (I've heard it all now, but arrogance that the UK should just roll over and die takes the biscuit!).  See the full article at http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/269242/Biggest-problem-in-EU-is-UK-says-ex-German-leader  

Comedian John Cleese States London Is No Longer An English City

John Cleese, the famous comedian who supports the Liberal Democrats, has made headlines in both the Daily Mail and the Daily Express today by declaring that London is no longer an English city.  In fact he said his friend asked, when visiting London, “where are all the English people”.   Where, indeed, has our culture gone when there is no evidence of it in London and it’s even remarked on by a Liberal Democrat!  Cameron has already admitted multiculturalism doesn’t work, but does nothing about controlling immigration.  Could it be that even the luvvies realise we are losing our cultures and traditions as people fail to mix into our society?

Germany Tiring of Eurozone Problems

Many people think it will be Germany itself who will bring an end to the Euro and then  the EU itself.  Well UKIP’s MEP Marta Andreasen has explained just exactly what is happening in Germany’s government in respect of the Euro crisis.  It seems that  Merkel can no longer secure a backing for the ‘rescue plan’ devised by herself and Mr Sarkozy in respect of the Eurozone, as she no longer as enough votes to do so. See full story ‘German Discontent Spreading, Says Mata’

Spain Stops Freedom of EU Workers Arriving

Spain has become the first country to use a Safeguard Clause to restrict the free movement of workers within the European Union.  On the 28^th July 2011, the Spanish government requested a restriction of movement of Romanian workers entering their country because of the serious disturbances to their labour market.  Romanian immigrants have risen from 388,000 in 2006 to 823,000 in 2010, 30% of them being unemployed.  The temporary measure has been allowed until 31 December 2012.

Whilst this has happened in Spain, it was announced in the Daily Mail yesterday that only UK businesses in the South are still recruiting whilst many companies in the North are shedding jobs.  The Mail reports that this has ‘raised fears that an unemployment timebomb is looming’.  How long will it be before we are in the same position as Spain, as workers from other EU countries still pour in, including those who come straight here to live on benefits. 

This is one to watch closely, to see which other member countries follow Spain as their individual economies spiral downwards with the recession.  It may well be the start of the end of freedom of movement between EU countries for unrestricted immigration. How would this leave the whole EU ideology?

See EU Press Release.

Also see full information regarding Spain from UKIP MEP Trevor Colman’s thEUnit.com and The Daily Mail ‘It’s going to be grimmer up North: Jobs divide set to widen across Britain as only employers in South continue to recruit’. 

David Cameron's Empty Answer To Why We Belong In The EU - Courtesy his Secretary

In the Express on Sunday, there is a copy of a letter sent to Conservative activist Anita Segar.  Ms Segar had written to the Prime Minister in respect of a referendum on EU membership.  The Prime Minister's political secretary, Laurence Mann, responded, and below is a copy of the letter.  It would appear that the arrogance of a government, who are totally out of touch with the people they are supposed to be representing, has no bounds.  Please note the reasons Mr Mann gives for staying in the EU, and why we pay approx £50,000,000 a day to belong to this organisation.  It would appear that Mr Mann is struggling for words and fails to provide any evidence of any benefits to the UK.  (See full articles The Letter sent by David Cameron's Political Secretary and PM will not have EU Referendum


Dear Ms Segar


I am writing on behalf of the Prime Minister to thank you for your letter of 12 July regarding our membership  of the EU.


We understand the strength of feeling of some who would prefer us not to be in the EU at all and that, like you, would like an in/out referendum to take place. There are some perfectly respectable arguments in favour of holding such a referendum. But there are also many strong counter-arguments, such as the fact that we had a referendum on that issue in 1975, which produced a very clear result.


There is also one argument, in particular, against holding such a referendum that we find irrefutably powerful, namely that most people in our country want to say neither ‘yes’ to everything from the EU, nor ‘no’ to everything.


The EU is not a matter of everything or nothing. We have, in the past, done well in ensuring that Britain can participate in the collective good carried out by the EU, such as free markets, while keeping out of things that we believe would be bad for our country. For example, we are not part of the Schengen Zone but have kept control of our own border controls, just as, crucially, we have kept the pound.


And we should not lose sight of the EU’s very useful work, such as ensuring that all the nations of Europe are equipped to face the biggest challenges of the 21st Century: global competitiveness, global warming and global poverty. These are compelling arguments for why we believe Britain should be an active member.


Of course the EU has some serious failings too, and there are certainly areas where its powers should be reduced. But a simplistic in/out referendum – posing an artificial choice that does not do justice to the range of views in the country – would be highly unlikely to settle the question of Britain’s membership of the EU at all.


Rather, the government believes it much more effective to use the weight of our membership to negotiate and force positive change.


The Government has also introduced a European Union Bill, currently before Parliament, which will give Parliament and voters more say over important EU decisions. This new legislation will ensure that if, in the future, there is a change to EU Treaties that move a power or an area from the UK to the EU, the Government of the day will have to ask for the British people’s consent in a national referendum before it can be agreed. This ‘referendum lock’ ensures that politicians in Whitehall will never again be able to hand over more power to Brussels without asking the British people first.


The Bill also places on a statutory footing the principle that Parliament is sovereign and that EU law only takes effect in the UK by virtue of the will of our own Parliament, expressed through Acts of Parliament.


Of course, in its first year in office this Government has been highly active on many other EU issues. We have made a good start in bringing the hitherto inexorable rise of the EU budget under control, saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds. We have ensured that from 2013, Britain can no longer be liable from Eurozone bail-outs, another legacy from the Labour Government we have had to sort out. 


And we are pushing forward measures that will be of benefit to Britain: making sure an EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement was reached, which will mean big new opportunities for British businesses; and ensuring that the lifting of regulatory burdens on businesses, particularly small businesses, is firmly on the EU agenda. We have achieved a good deal in getting the countries of the EU to use their collective weight in the world effectively, such as on tough, targeted sanctions on Iran or action to help countries moving towards democracy in the southern Mediterranean.


The Prime Minister fully understands that our membership of the EU incites strong feels (sic) in many people. But I hope this goes some way to explaining why we believe that an in/out referendum would be highly unlikely properly to settle the question of Britain’s membership of the EU, and also how we are securing the best deal for British people through our active and positive membership, while ensuring that our national sovereignty is protected in the future. Please be reassured that the Prime Minister would never allow our country to slide into a federal Europe.


Yours sincerely




Laurence Mann


Here below are a few points that both Mr Cameron and Mr Mann ought to think about!  


1. "We understand the strength of feeling of some who would prefer us not to be in the EU at all and that, like you, would like an in/out referendum to take place. There are some perfectly respectable arguments in favour of holding such a referendum. But there are also many strong counter-arguments, such as the fact that we had a referendum on that issue in 1975, which produced a very clear result."  The strong counter arguments are never put in the public arena, in fact the main British television news and some national newspapers carry very little, or no news at all about EU powers over Britain, or, in fact, any benefits that have been evident.  So one can only assume that there are no benefits.  To say we had a vote in 1975 about entering the EU is a falsehood, the majority of the public hadn't realised that Edward Heath had already signed on the dotted line a couple of years earlier, actually, the referendum was 'should we stay in the EU'.  It was sold to the public as purely a common market for trade and job movement within Europe.  The document displayed in thEUnit.com website called  'Sovereignty and the European Communities' FCO 30/1048 - 1971, was an advisory document for ministers in respect of how the British public would take to the news of losing their sovereignty.  This document was kept top secret for 30 years! So the full proposals of Britain losing its sovereignty was never released at the time of voting. 


2. "There is also one argument, in particular, against holding such a referendum that we find irrefutably powerful, namely that most people in our country want to say neither ‘yes’ to everything from the EU, nor ‘no’ to everything."  Mr Cameron knows that he is not delivering to the British public what they want, to be an independent country without being ruled by the EU, so he ignores what the majority of the people in Britain want.  Where does this stand with democracy?


3. "The EU is not a matter of everything or nothing. We have, in the past, done well in ensuring that Britain can participate in the collective good carried out by the EU, such as free markets, while keeping out of things that we believe would be bad for our country. For example, we are not part of the Schengen Zone but have kept control of our own border controls, just as, crucially, we have kept the pound. And we should not lose sight of the EU’s very useful work, such as ensuring that all the nations of Europe are equipped to face the biggest challenges of the 21st Century: global competitiveness, global warming and global poverty. These are compelling arguments for why we believe Britain should be an active member."   Although we didn't sign the Schengen Zone agreement, we have little control over our borders, as free movement between EU countries means that most people have headed for the UK where the benefits system has been a big draw.  The EU made it policy a few months ago that welfare has to be paid to anyone who arrives on our shores from day one!  The EU also plan to bring in their own border control.  The EU are already in the process of taking over our coastguards, so there will be no control over our own coasts and borders at all in the future. Mr Mann's argument for the 'benefits' of global competitiveness, global warming and global poverty are almost laughable. Global competitiveness means they want a cheap labour workforce, probably one reason why we have no border control and few jobs given to British workers. Global warming is now a very questionable science with little or no evidence in its favour in respect of either the planet warming, or that carbon has any contribution to this. Carbon appears to be the new 'gold', the EU can deal in CER's (Carbon credits), another tax and something that will cripple any industry that Britain has left, as countries like China and India will not pay for carbon emissions. As for global poverty, whilst charity serves a purpose to help those in terrible need, bringing poverty to the donor nations is hardly right.  As with the plans to tax the UK via carbon and 'green technology', draining money from the UK for foreign aid that is not even categorised properly, at a time of deep recession, is beyond belief.  How will you explain why people will not be able to buy food or heat their homes in the UK Mr Cameron?


4. "The Government has also introduced a European Union Bill, currently before Parliament, which will give Parliament and voters more say over important EU decisions. This new legislation will ensure that if, in the future, there is a change to EU Treaties that move a power or an area from the UK to the EU, the Government of the day will have to ask for the British people’s consent in a national referendum before it can be agreed. This ‘referendum lock’ ensures that politicians in Whitehall will never again be able to hand over more power to Brussels without asking the British people first."  This Bill is virtually useless, the treaties already signed ensure that EU laws override UK legislation and in the Lisbon Treaty there is Article 1-18 Flexibility Clause, which was signed by Gordon Brown.  The Flexibility Clause allows anything not already covered in the treaty to be enforced. I say again, is this democratic?


5. "Of course, in its first year in office this Government has been highly active on many other EU issues. We have made a good start in bringing the hitherto inexorable rise of the EU budget under control, saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds. We have ensured that from 2013, Britain can no longer be liable from Eurozone bail-outs, another legacy from the Labour Government we have had to sort out"  Our contribution to the EU budget has risen, not stayed the same or fallen. The EU also plan to tax us direct in respect of VAT and fuel etc., Mr Cameron is even on the brink of giving back our rebate, which Mrs Thatcher fought so hard for us to get.


6. "And we are pushing forward measures that will be of benefit to Britain: making sure an EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement was reached, which will mean big new opportunities for British businesses; and ensuring that the lifting of regulatory burdens on businesses, particularly small businesses, is firmly on the EU agenda. We have achieved a good deal in getting the countries of the EU to use their collective weight in the world effectively, such as on tough, targeted sanctions on Iran or action to help countries moving towards democracy in the southern Mediterranean"   Britain buys more from other EU countries than it sells to them, The fact that our businesses are failing is due to the red tape issued by Brussels, who tie enterprise in knots!  Also boasting about bringing democracy to other countries is shameful, as the EU member countries are losing any democracy they ever had. 


7. "The Prime Minister fully understands that our membership of the EU incites strong feels (sic) in many people. But I hope this goes some way to explaining why we believe that an in/out referendum would be highly unlikely properly to settle the question of Britain’s membership of the EU, and also how we are securing the best deal for British people through our active and positive membership, while ensuring that our national sovereignty is protected in the future. Please be reassured that the Prime Minister would never allow our country to slide into a federal Europe."  I don't think that either Mr Mann or the Prime Minister has any idea how strong the British public feel about our membership of the EU.  If there are 'best deals' why haven't we heard about them? Our sovereignty already appears to have been eroded via the 6 treaties signed since membership of the EU began, wasn't it just a few weeks ago that the government were alarmed to have to debate on wild animals being used in circuses in the UK, as they hadn't had directives from the EU on it?  Exactly how much power has the government got left Mr Cameron?

And If Conspiracy Theories Are True..........

Thought for today!   If New World Order is happening, and it certainly looks like something sinister is going on with America in financial chaos, as well as the EU countries, then have the people who are running New World Order thought about the future?  Transferring money from the West to the developing countries is what they intend.  Taking all their companies to China and India and places like that.  But the big question is:  ONCE IT’S HAPPENED WHO IS GOING TO BUY THEIR PRODUCTS?  There are too many poor people in China, Africa and India and the other third World countries who can’t all be well off enough to by computers, cars etc. SO WHO?? Just a thought!

Enough is Enough as Dutch Town Puts Block on Unemployed Immigrants Settling

A Dutch town has just announced that from September there will be a ban on unemployed foreigners settling there.  Vaals, in the southern province of Limburg says it already has too many EU member country foreigners claiming benefits.  The Belgian town of Plombieres announced the same sort of ban last week.  This hasn't gone down too well with the EU who are threatening legal action.  See full article 'Dutch town bans unemployed Eastern migrants from settling'

Has Multiculturalism Failed in Europe?

The terrible tragedy in Norway has been reported in depth on RT.com  and RT television.  They examine the future for multiculturalism and the outlook for the European Union in respect of open borders.  It's now known that 50% of the Norwegian people are against multiculturalism and Norway, who signed the Schengen open border agreement, have now closed their borders. Does this mean the end of the multiculturalism project in Europe? Maybe people just aren't meant to share a mixture of cultures in the same communities and this terrible terrorist attack by one of Norway's own people may be the tip of the iceberg about how people feel.   If this is the case, there is every possibility that this won't be the last such attack in Europe.  Do we really want to live in a country where, not only the people are in danger, but where our government have to be driven about in armoured cars and never appear in public, because of growing anger from people feeling displaced and alienated?

See http://rt.com/news/norway-attack-multiculturalism/

and http://rt.com/news/eu-norway-attacks/ 

Phone Hacking or Gagging the News? Kinnock Gives the Game Away!

What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive! Most probably you can't believe the amount of news coverage and time parliament has given to the News of the World phone hacking scandal. Well an MEP suggested a little while ago that it may be a smoke screen for something else, and it seems that may be true.  Whilst phone hacking is truly shameful and should be dealt with properly, lets get things into scale.  The world is in financial meltdown because the Euro countries such as Greece are near to defaulting on their debts, bringing the world's economy crashing down, which will throw the UK as well as other nations, including America into the deepest recession ever. (it's not only the banks who lend the money in the first place who will lose billions, debts are sold on and then other institutions insure them, that's why countries like America are involved too). So what does David Cameron come back home early from Africa to debate on, yes you guessed it, the phone hacking scandal.  Media such as the BBC continually appear to censor any news about how deeply we are governed by the EU and only give very limited time to mentioning how badly the Eurozone is doing.  It would seem now that the government wants to do the same sort of censorship with the national press.  How is hiding bad news the way to go? do they think people won't notice when they can no longer afford to buy food or heat their homes because everything is sky high?  Maybe the government think a knight in shining armour is going to come along and save the Euro from the nasty dragon, little hope.  Like EU President Barroso said, there is no Plan B if the bailouts don't work.

Now Neil Kinnock has famously let the cat out of the bag by telling how the government would like to censor the press, he announced on the Today program that "the Press should be bound by the same rules of impartiality as the BBC."  Only this week the BBC announced that they would give global warming sceptics even less air time than they do now (I don't know how you can add  even 'less air time' to the 'no air time' they already gave them, but there you go!).

So looking at the whole picture and the overkill in respect of Mr Murdoch and the News of the World phone hacking, which should just have been dealt with by the police, it looks as if this is a plan to censor our wonderful free press.  What next? a total shut down of the internet? is democracy finally dead and buried?

Russian Television Report On Euro Crisis

UKIP's Paul Nuttall Jeered at For Debating EU Flags on UK Sports Star's Strips

EU Plans To Make British Athletes Wear The European Flag

The people of Britain continue to hear that they will pay more taxes, lose their jobs and foot energy bills which will be sky high due to hidden 'green taxes'.  On top of everything else there is the expense of the Olympic Games next year, to which every tax payer has contributed to building the site and the running costs of the coming event. It's supposed to be a British held Olympics and a showcase for the rest of the world.  But news in the Daily Express and Daily Mail this morning claims that the EU are branding our own athletes with the EU flag.  Maybe people will start to realise how much the UK is being taken apart to be completely under the control of the United States of Europe once these visual EU emblems start to appear.  Will this new scheme to fly the EU flag on our athletes' sports gear be discussed in parliament today? I doubt it!  Read 'British Teams Forced to Wear EU Flags in today's Daily Express and British Sports Stars Could be Forced to Wear EU Flags on Kits in the Daily Mail. .

Brussels Makes a Grab To Create Its Superstate Whilst British Press Discuss Phone Hacking

Whilst the British news channels are full of nothing but the phone hacking scandal with Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks, Brussels seems to be grabbing the Eurozone countries by the scruff of the neck to quickly take their sovereignty, by making economical claims on their countries.  It looks as if it will be completed by the end of the year or possibly the summer. Therefore finalising their plans for the Federal States of Europe. See article in today's Daily Express by Patrick O'Flynn 'As Italy and Spain wobble, Brussels plots a Superstate'  Mr O'Flynn says the good news is the fact that Britain is not in it, however, one of the main areas of the Maastricht Treaty was the aim to include all countries in the single currency, so we will have to wait and see!

Getting back to the phone hacking and Rupert Murdoch closing the News of the World and withdrawing his bid for BSKYB.  Politicians are now making out that they want transparency from the press in the future.  Does this mean that the national newspapers (besides the Daily Express and the Daily Mail, who are doing an excellent job reporting on the EU), plus the BBC and SKY television news will now include stories about the EU running Britain?  Maybe we will have the EU and the Treaties discussed on Question Time, somehow I can't see it.  In the meantime we have to rely on RT.com (Russian tv) to hear about the news affecting Britain.

Explosive EU Document Kept Top Secret

MEP Trevor Coleman, who held a very successful UKIP meeting in Bodmin, Cornwall last week, had an original document with him which dated back to the early 1970s when Edward Heath signed the UK over to the ECC (EU).  This document was marked 'top secret' for 30 years and it proves that joining the EU just for trade and jobs, was not true.  It was known right from the beginning that the UK would lose its freedom to rule itself, its democracy and its sovereignty.  The public were not only mislead, but lied to in respect of joining the European Union.  You can now see the whole document at  thEUnit.com.  Watch the video on this page of theEUnit.com as well for information about the document.

EU Smoke and Mirrors

Sometimes things look clear, but when you read further into them they are far from being transparent.  A headline in a Westcountry newspaper, the Western Morning News looked for all the world as if a Tory politician was joining the ranks of the many MP's who now want the UK to come out of Europe, as they realised that they have little power to govern Britain without consulting the European Commission.  However Conservative MP for Camborne and Redruth, George Eustice, appears to be playing a crafty game for David Cameron.  In the guise of someone who doesn't agree with Europe wielding so much clout as far as Britain is concerned, he has convened a group of approximately 100 seemingly Eurosceptic Tory MPs to urge David Cameron to regain power from the EU by staying in Europe.  The newspaper states that Mr Eustice says "the group of "moderate" members will seek to exploit frustration among British policymakers who are regularly block by European Union Law. The group is keen to distance itself from hardline anti-EU MPs in the Conservative ranks who make relentless yet unrealistic calls, such as immediate withdrawal from the union."

I'm afraid this would appear to be all smoke and mirrors from Mr Eustice and his group of MPs who are just towing the Cameron party line of reform from within the EU, which the majority of people have wised up to now, as the Coalition have done very little but to give the EU more powers and more taxpayers money.  I would assume that Mr Eustice would be creating this situation to divert attention away from the real Eurosceptics and also convince people that they should vote for these 'middle  'safe' players', when in fact they appear to be following the Tory lead.

As I wrote previously, the 6 Treaties have embroiled the UK into the quickly forming Federal States of Europe, signed by each Prime Minister from Edward Heath onwards.  The EU, or the Union as they now like to be called continues to grab power with the co-operation of the Coalition and halting it now from within is virtually impossible.  As far as the smoke and mirrors are concerned, once clear, the smoke will reveal the amount of the population who now realise that we have lost our sovereignty and our country into foreign hands.  One of the very first EU documents, which was kept top secret for 30 years, covered the fact that Britain would lose its sovereignty, this never was just about trading with other EU countries, see thEUnit.com, which has a copy of the document called Sovereignty and the European Communities. There was concern, even then about how the public would react, so there has been a blanket of silence ever since.  Cameron take note, the public are catching on fast and getting angry that they no longer have a ruling government and it's time for him to tell the truth about the loss of sovereignty.  So what will happen next? the cards are on the table and Mr Eustice can't have it both ways, he is either with Cameron who seeks to impossibly reform from within (he says), or he chooses the route to regain our country and stand loyal to its people.

Nigel Farage says the Worm has Finally Turned

Both the Dutch and the Danes Make A Stand About EU Border Controls

Could this be the end of the EU Super State dream?  The dream that saw European member countries losing their individual nations and becoming just borderless regions in the giant EU bloc?  The Danes, who are part of the open borders Schengen Agreement, have decided to restore their borders with Germany and Sweden because of increased crime and drug trafficking brought about by the flow of mostly Eastern European people travelling to Denmark.  Likewise the Dutch are in dispute with the EU because they want to deport immigrants who come into Holland and do not find work within 3 months of entry.  They also want to stop them claiming welfare as soon as they enter the country.  This year Britain was ordered by the EU to pay welfare as soon as someone steps onto British shores, in spite of the newcomers not contributing a penny to the UK.  With the shaky position of the Euro and the member countries seeking to control their own borders again, one wonders if other EU countries will follow suit in respect of immigrants and if this spells the end of the whole EU project.
See Denmark fences itself off from the EU, raising disintegration fears and Dutch want to throw out migrant Poles who can't find a job

Hazel Blears Signed on the Dotted Line to Merge England With France

Whilst Britain faces austerity cuts, the EU are spending our money on the INTERREG programme. ((we give approximately £50,000,000 a day to the EU without extras like direct Euro Bailout money, IMF (part of which is being used to bailout the Euro countries), or green taxes which are included in our energy and fuel bills by stealth)).  The INTERREG program was signed off in Europe by Labour's Hazel Blears and is the project to merge the South of England in with France, calling it Arc Manche or the Transmanche administration region.  To promote renaming England and losing our nationality the EU have awarded £37,000 to the English Arthurian Fantasy group and the French Centre de l'Imaginaire Arthurein for a film project called 'Sharing Our Stories'. £40,000 is being spent on the 'Channel Circus Arts Alliance' for a 'better understanding of the new forms of circus'.  £192,000 has been granted to the 'DanSCe Dialogues' which is arts and cultural training in dance, to increase collaboration between France and England in the Euro Region.  As I reported before there are plans for  cross channel cycle lanes with signs with the new Arc Manche logo to make sure we know we are no longer in England.  (see Full story in the Daily Mail).

I wonder how Hazel Blears feels about breaking her country apart and putting it into foreign hands!