The Truth About The State Of The Euro

Whilst the Coalition squabble amongst themselves about the AV vote system, they turn people's attention away from what really matters, How the EU are buying their own debts and dragging the Euro member countries down, how it will drag the UK down with the Euro member's bailouts and how the whole thing is nearing total collapse.  Take a look at this video of UKIP leader Nigel Farage who is an expert on finance.  Particularly see the end of the video where he challenges the non-democratic EU's power over its member countries.  We haven't had much coverage in our media about the demonstrations in Greece, no doubt the BBC choose to bury this along with the assistance of Europhiles Lib Dems, Labour and Tories. 

The Poisonous Light Bulbs and Carbon Lies

It’s reported in the Daily Mail this week that energy saving light bulbs send out cancer causing chemicals, and scientists now say they should not be used in close proximity with a persons head or be used for long periods.  It has always been known that if broken, the bulbs were a danger because they contain mercury.  However German research has shown that the bulbs also emit carcinogenic steam when switched on.  In their mania to convert us away from carbon emissions, the EU have ruled that old incandescent bulbs are to be phased out by the end of next year.  In view of these findings in respect of the ‘green’ bulbs, this will be a test of how they really regard the health and safety of the public to whom they are enforcing their CO2 theory in respect of global warming.

In fact the planet hasn’t warmed for the last decade, carbon is a plant food, which, when higher levels are recorded, helps to yield better crops.  Lord Christopher Monckton,  Deputy Leader of UKIP, has recently written an article about how this carbon fraud, with the help of Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne, will make the EU very rich indeed. See ‘Make Dictators Rich Week!’.  Lord Monckton has an impressive past with a wealth of scientific knowledge and he has shown through many articles just how the public have been frightened and conned by the threat of global warming of the planet being caused by CO2.  The case for CO2 causing global warming has been awash with scandal, the very people who carried out the research at East Anglia University from which most of the carbon theory was spread, were found to have fraudulently altered their evidence, which only came to light after their emails had been hacked into.  

The EU are still pressing ahead with ‘green’ taxes and enforcing green technology on us even though there is no real evidence for carbon being any danger at all.  Carbon makes up 2% of greenhouse gasses, the rest is water vapour, and of that 2% of carbon, only 2% is said to be man-made.  The EU are setting up carbon trading, and in that, our emissions from carbon will be capped, making us buy carbon via CER’s (carbon trading certificates).  To be able to manufacture goods or even just to live, we will be paying for this excess of carbon above what the EU have decided is our limit (a limit the Labour government signed to).  China and India who produce most of the world’s carbon because of their massive industry infrastructures won’t be capped at all and can sell carbon back to us.  Not only will they be the sole producers of goods eventually, we will be paying them for the privilege because we will be tied into buying carbon.

The EU are using carbon to control us, they are treating it like the new ‘gold’, we are literally buying fresh air and in a latest survey in the UK it’s clearly shown that the majority of people know it’s a scam.  How much longer will this fraud be allowed to continue, it’s our money and our lives they are playing with

UK Suffers Cuts Whilst EU Demands More Money

Whilst the cutbacks planned and implemented in the UK should save around £6.2billion, the EU are demanding another 6% raise in their annual budget, which would make the UK’s contribution nearly 10billion a year (more than £400 extra from every household in the UK.)  See the full story in the Daily Express,where UKIP’s Nigel Farage speaks out and Euro MP Daniel Hannan says he doesn’t know why protesters aren’t taking to the streets.   See Outrage as EC Calls for £7bn budget rise  

UK Would Have to Leave EU to Reverse ECHR's Ruling on Prisoner's Votes

Over the last few days the question of prisoners being allowed to vote has been in the news.  The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) have ruled that the ban on allowing prisoners to vote in elections is against the law because of the prisoner’s Human Rights! Therefore we must reverse our laws, which date back a 140 years, in respect of prisoners forfeiting their rights to vote once they go to prison. A great many people are saying that the ECHR are actually the same as the European Union, whilst others are pointing out that in fact the ECHR and the EU are two separate bodies, which in fact they are.  However, you can’t have one without the other if you are a country within the EU.  As much as David Cameron gives lip service about ignoring the ECHR’s decision to overrule the UK’s laws which stop prisoners from voting, he knows very well that to defy the ECHR is to defy the European Union.  

The EU requires that all members be signatories of the European Convention on Human Rights and to accept the rulings and jurisdictions of the ECHR that enforces it, therefore the ECHR overrules the sovereignties of the EU member countries. The only way to govern ourselves and to relinquish the power held over us by the ECHR is to leave the EU and pull out of the convention and the jurisdiction of the European Court.

So in spite of Mr Camerson throwing his hands up in shock at being told to give prisoners the vote, it would seem that he knew all along that he cannot defy the rulings of the ECHR, because the UK would have to leave the EU to do so.  So at the end of the day we are totally under the ECHR’s jurisdiction and unable to enforce our own rulings, should the ECHR decide to reverse them.

EU Plan Direct Taxes From the UK

The EU are trying to increase their powers over the UK to become a ruling State by proposing to tax the British people at source.  Yes people of the United Kingtom, the European Commission are demanding to take extra taxes off of us all by implementing the following:

Financial transaction tax, an Emissions Trading Scheme (selling carbon, of which harm as a greenhouse gas is disputed by many eminent scientists), Air transport tax, EU VAT (astonishing this one!) and Energy tax.

Take a look at how Nigel Farage is speaking up for the UK and I would like to think the people of the other member states get to see this video too, because in their times of austerity, like us, they will not want to pay to belong to a community where they get nothing back for the billions they are paying in:

President Van Rompuy Tries To Steal UK's Thunder Over Libya

In an article in the Daily Express today the un-elected president of Europe, Herman Van Rompuy, is claiming victory for the EU, saying that they have saved Libya from a bloodbath because of Brussels diplomacy. He stated in his speech “From the beginning, the European Union was at the forefront.  Without European leadership there would have been massacres.  We acted in time and without Europe nothing would have been done at the global level or at the UN level.”

This astonishing announcement by Van Rompuy would appear to be wishful thinking.  EU foreign Affairs Minister Baroness Ashton,  put a block on any action of a no-fly zone proposed by the UK within the first weeks of the Libya rebellion. Action was only taken after a United Nations resolution based on proposals previously put by Britain. 

See also report in the Sun newspaper ‘Cameron’s No-fly Plan Shot Down'

To Vote For AV Or Not! I Asked UKIP Their Views

AV, or Alternative Voting, has been a little confusing for people and the decision whether or not to vote for this new system is a pretty important one.  In view of this, I telephoned UKIP’s head office to ask if they supported AV against the ‘first past the post’ method used at the present time.  They told me that, although AV isn’t a perfect way of counting votes, it is better than the present system.  With AV people have a chance to list all those they would like to see get in, even if their first choice doesn’t get enough votes, the others still stand a chance, (i.e. in a list of 1 to 5 candidates of your choice, number 1 would be your favourite to win the seat and the others your alternative choices, should number 1 not get enough votes, the votes for the others are then counted).  The person voted for must get 50% of the overall votes to be elected, so if they don’t get that many, the votes for the second most popular candidate are counted and the same applies, they must get 50% of the votes to get in.  This is carried on until one of the people listed get the right percentage.  This gives parties like UKIP a fairer crack of the whip.  However, in respect of their fantastic success in Barnsley, UKIP will most probably be first on the list with many people at the next election should AV take effect or not. The Conservatives for one seem very rattled at this type of voting getting in and this says a lot about how worried they must be that UKIP will finally win,  as they will at last be on a level playing field.

The Un-Elected Swedish Human Rights Chief Attacks UK On Prisoner's Votes Issue

The Daily Mail reported today that Europe's Human Rights Chief, Swedish born Thomas Hammarberg has made a verbal attack against the UK's decision to resist the ruling from the European Court to give prisoners the right to vote.

Un-elected by the British people, Thomas Hammarberg, the Council for Human Rights Commissioner insisted that a 140-year-old-ban on inmates taking part in elections could not be justified.  He says "That approach does not correspond to the European values of our times."  He says in an article published on-line that the court's judgment "was not particularly popular in the UK"  He also added that "democracy was once established through the idea of universal suffrage.  To be deprived of this right (to vote) is to be declared an outcast, a non-person."  So where and how do we vote on your position Mr Hammarberg, maybe you would like to comment on this blog and tell us!